Skip to main content
· 9/26/2007

Cartier v. D & D JEWELRY IMPORTS

Citations

  • 510 F. Supp. 2d 344
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71904
  • 2007 WL 2782996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering only the second step of the transfer inquiry where the parties did not dispute the action could have been brought in the proposed transferee court
  • considering only the second step of the transfer inquiry where the parties did not dispute the action could have been brought in the proposed transferee court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard J. Holwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.