Carthorne v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring plaintiff to show that hostile work environment was “because of her protected activity”
• interpreting Title VID; Gomez-Perez v. Potter, 553 U.S. 474, 479 (2008) (interpreting ADEA
• “[O]ur general practice is not to consider arguments the parties failed to raise before the trial court.”
• “[F]ederal employees may bring claims of retaliation under Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).