· 10/5/2007
Carter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Citations
- 503 F.3d 143
- 378 U.S. App. D.C. 244
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23369
- 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,967
- 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1226
- 2007 WL 2891428
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an argument was improperly raised when first raised in the movant's motion for reconsideration
- finding that an argument was improperly raised when first raised in the movant’s motion for reconsideration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.