Carter v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although deed of par- tition was not acknowledged or recorded at time of execution, the validity of the conveyance as between the parties was unaffected
• “The fact that it was not then acknowledged or recorded would have rendered it ineffective as to innocent purchasers for value, 28 V.I.C. § 124, but did not affect its validity as a conveyance binding upon the parties to it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).