Skip to main content

Carter v. State

Citations

  • 739 N.E.2d 126
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 1119
  • 2000 WL 1745231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that under these circumstances, the defendant must request permission to withdraw his plea
  • determining that the trial court did not err in denying permission to withdraw a guilty plea, despite a later protestation of innocence
  • holding the trial court did not err by denying the defendant permission to withdraw his guilty plea at the sentencing hearing held a month after the guilty plea hearing
  • explaining that a defendant’s failure to submit a verified, written motion to withdraw a guilty plea generally results in waiver of the issue of wrongful denial of the request
  • noting that Indiana’s rule against accepting a guilty plea that is accompanied by a protestation of innocence “is explicitly contingent . . . upon the protestation of innocence occurring at the same time the defendant attempts to enter the plea”
  • “[C]ourt permission is required to withdraw a guilty plea, even when the plea has not been accepted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.