District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/23/2013
Carter v. State
Citations
- 120 So. 3d 207
- 2013 WL 4483032
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13445
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding no competent, substantial evidence supported sole rationale for traffic stop, and therefore, reversing denial of suppression
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger, Palmer, Torpy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- Duval Utility Co. v. FLA. PUBLIC SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-02-21· cited 23×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-17· cited 22×
- State v. BowersSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-02-23· cited 18×
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-11· cited 12×
- Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-24· cited 11×
- State v. AdderlyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-13· cited 6×
- State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-15· cited 6×
- CM v. Dept. of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-12· cited 4×
- Reed v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-30· cited 2×
- Rahyns v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.