Carter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We believe that a trial court should have the discretion to cure a discriminatory challenge by means other than dismissal of the entire panel. However, this court and the trial courts are bound by the clear language of Neil, absent directions otherwise from the Florida supreme court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lozano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-25· cited 20×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-17· cited 12×
• Mazaheritehrani v. Brooks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-28· cited 7×
• Aldret v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-26· cited 7×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-08· cited 6×
• Jefferson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-07· cited 5×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-06· cited 5×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-24· cited 2×
• Barnes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-28· cited 2×
• Jones v. Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-13· cited 2×
• Rosado v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-16· cited 2×
• Aldret v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-31· cited 1×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Neil
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 507×
• Orange v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-27· cited 5×