Carter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “corroboration of public facts or wholly innocuous details” cannot meet the Aguilar/Spinelli requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 30×
• Bachlet v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-06-13· cited 11×
• Samson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-06-14· cited 10×
• McClelland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-12-06· cited 8×
• Shorty v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-08-07· cited 8×
• Lloyd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-04-19· cited 7×
• Michael Clayton v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-01· cited 6×
• Lustig v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-11-23· cited 4×
• Stam v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-10-11· cited 3×
• Landon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-05-30· cited 3×
• Mark Wayne King v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-04-16· cited 1×
• Rynearson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-12-19
• Lum v. Koles
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2018-09-21
• Ruaro v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-07-27