Carter v. McCoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding ambiguity where ‘we cannot say with any degree of certainty [what the clause] was intended to exclude’
• finding ambiguity where “we cannot say with any degree of certainty [what the clause] was intended to exclude”
• overruled on other grounds by Weiss v. United Fire and Cas. Co., 197 Wis.2d 365, 541 N.W.2d 753 (1995)
• insured entitled to coverage under policy if it can demonstrate it qualifies under terms and condi- tions
• in a narrow decision, holding that plaintiffs who allege a private right of action under CUIPA do not first have to exhaust their administrative remedies
• determinative question in construing insurance contract is intent of parties, i.e., what coverage insured expected to receive and what insurer was to provide as disclosed by policy provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).