Carter v. Kinslair

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an injury’s characterization as permanent or temporary depends on the cost of restoration, not the type of harm
• excluding expert testimony on the “actual cash value” of property because the expert did not know the property’s condition, use, life expectancy, or the material it was made from, making her valuation “just a rough estimate of what the items were worth”
• discussing Ellison, 32 S.W.3d at 69–70

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).