Carter v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] statute must be viewed as a whole and, where possible, intent given to all its parts.”
• “[L]ien credits against future benefits attach when and to the extent an employee receives settlement payments,” even if the payments are graduated payments made over a period of time.
• “[W]e seek to avoid inconsistency in the application of the statute.”
• \[W]e seek to avoid inconsistency in the application of the statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).