Carter v. Hanrath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that record title owner’s inability to use part of their property where it was landlocked “cannot realistically be characterized as acquiescence or consent by silence”
• stating that once the elements of boundary by acquiescence are established, there is a presumption of ownership
• stating that once the elements of boundary by acquiescence are established, there is a presumption of ownership
• \The rule of boundary by acquiescence serves a useful and practical purpose when applied where adjoining owners are seemingly content to recognize a marked line or monument not on the true line as the practical boundary between them.\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).