Carter v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if a text message ‘includes or introduces an 5 advertisement’ or ‘constitutes telemarketing,’ it may only be sent with the recipient's 6 prior express written consent, whereas other texts require only prior express consent to 7 be legal.”
• holding the plaintiffs had not shown sufficient contacts with 5 California to establish specific jurisdiction for tort claims against an international soccer 6 association in California federal court
• “[A]n agency’s motion to remand for reconsideration of its own decision is usually granted.”
• “[T]o the extent that Plaintiffs may claim hardship in being required to bring more than one legal challenge, the Court has not considered this kind of litigation cost saving sufficient by itself to justify review in a case that would otherwise be unripe.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).