Carter v. Greenhow
Citations
- 114 U.S. 317
- 5 S. Ct. 928
- 29 L. Ed. 202
- 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1763
Syllabus
<p>The 16th clause of § 639 Rev. Stat.. authorizing suits, without reference to the sum or value in controversy or the citizenship of the parties, to be brought in the Circuit Courts of the United States to redress the deprivation, under color of State law, of any right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States, in violation of §1979 Bev. Stat., does not embrace an action of trespass on the ease in which the plaintiff seeks a recovery of damages against a tax collector in Virginia, who, having rejected a tender of tax-receivable coupons, issued under the act of March 30, 1871, seeks to collect the tax for which they were tendered by a seizure and sale of personal property of the plaintiff.</p> <p>Although the right to have such coupons received in payment of taxes is founded on a contract with the State, and that right is protected by the Constitution of the United States, Art. 1, Sec. 10, forbidding the State to pass any laws impairing the obligation of the contract, the only mode of redress in ease of any disturbance or dispossession of property, or for other legal rights based on such violation of the contract, is to have a judicial determination, in a suit between individuals, of the invalidity of the law, under color of which the wrong has been committed. No direct action for the denial of the right secured by the contract will lie.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \the only right secured” by the Contract Clause is the \right to have a judicial determination declaring the nullity of the attempt to impair [the] obligation”
- stating that “the only right secured” by the Contract Clause is “to have a judicial determination, declaring the nullity of the attempt to impair [the contract’s] obligation”
- stating that `the only right secured' by the Contract Clause is `to have a judicial determination, declaring the nullity of the attempt to impair [the contract's] obligation'
- stating that ‘the only right secured’ by the Contract Clause is ‘to have a judicial determination, declaring the nullity of the attempt to impair [the contract’s] obligation’
- seeming to reject the statute’s application to a Contracts Clause claim
- “[T]he individual has a right to have a judicial determination declaring the nullity of the attempt to impair [the] obligation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews, Bradley, Millee, Geay, Pabsons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.