Carter v. Gambulous

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was unforeseeable that an intoxicated driver would crash into a store window and injure a shopper inside, so the store owner owed no duty to fortify the store
• “While [the a]ppellee is indeed under a duty to use reasonable care with respect to his customers, the accident herein was not foreseeable, and [the a]ppellee is not an absolute insurer of his customers’ safety.”
• vehicle “crashed through the window of Appellee’s business.”
• vehicle “crashed through the window of Appellee’s business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).