Carter v. Fred's Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute precluding recovery for occupational diseases that remained latent for longer than five years was substantive
• explaining that statute will not be construed to apply retroactively without clear language indicating 10 Legislature’s intent
• explaining that statute will not be construed to apply retroactively without clear language indicating Legislature’s intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).