· 3/21/2007
Carter v. Escondido Union High School District
Citations
- 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 262
- 148 Cal. App. 4th 922
- 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1566
- 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2948
- 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3753
- 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “disclosing to the athletic director that [a 14 coach] had recommended a protein shake to a student is not protected by section 1102.5”
- finding 9 the facts alleged were not sufficient to state a claim under Section 1102.5(b
- a plaintiff 11 must be able to identify a specific state or federal statute, rule, or regulation which he believed the 12 defendants were violating
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.