Carter v. Davis

Citations

6 Wash. 327
33 P. 833
1893 Wash. LEXIS 292

Syllabus

<p>EXEMPTIONS — ABSCONDING HOUSEHOLDER.</p> <p>Where a person has left the state with intent to defraud his creditors his property is not exempt from attachment, and his wife cannot claim the statutory exemption in his behalf.</p>

Judges: Anders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Freedman Bros. v. Parker
Ninth Circuit· 1911-02-06· cited 36×
Hills v. Joseph
Ninth Circuit· 1916-02-07· cited 21×
Creditors Collection Ass'n v. Bisbee
Washington Supreme Court· 1914-07-07· cited 15×
In re Crook
W.D. Washington· 1915-01-14· cited 10×
In re Scheier
E.D. Washington· 1911-06-02· cited 4×
In re Buelow
W.D. Washington· 1899-11-24· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.