Carter v. Crow's Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding justifiable reliance was sufficiently pled where the plaintiffs paid full price for defective vehicles
• explaining “NJCFA materially conflicts with the consumer protection statutes of California, the CLRA and UCL”
• knowledge in 2009 sufficiently pled where complaint alleged “early consumer complaints about the defect” and cited technical service bulletins about the defect dating from 2005

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).