· 4/11/2023
Carter v. Civil Service Commission
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a three-year delay within longer delay was itself inordinate
- concluding that a three-year delay within longer delay was itself inordinate
- concluding that a three-year delay within longer delay was itself inordinate
- excusing exhaustion requirement where post-conviction petition had been pending for over twenty years in large part due to state's delay in disclosing discovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.