Carter v. Cessna Finance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “speculation, surmise and conjecture are inadmissible at trial and legally insufficient to create a disputed issue of fact” in a summary judgment proceeding
• noting that “speculation, surmise and conjecture, are inadmissible at trial and legally insufficient to create a disputed issue of fact” in a summary judgment proceeding
• “In short, a party does not create a fact question merely by placing his assertions in affidavit form.”
• “In short, a party does not create a fact question merely by placing his assertions in affidavit form.”
• “A factual basis for the affiant’s knowl edge need not be set out where the affiant is shown to be in a position where he would necessarily possess the knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).