Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/15/1960
Carter v. Carter
Citations
- 147 Conn. 238
- 159 A.2d 173
- 1960 Conn. LEXIS 133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute prescribing procedure for attaching property of nonresident is exclusive and in derogation of common law and, therefore, must be strictly construed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, King, Murphy, Mellitz, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 190×
- Sassone v. LeporeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 127×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-07-27· cited 93×
- LaBow v. LaBowSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-08-17· cited 62×
- Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-12-02· cited 44×
- White-Bowman Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. BiaforeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-05· cited 41×
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-07-17· cited 39×
- Trichilo v. TrichiloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-02· cited 37×
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-11-29· cited 29×
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-04-01· cited 23×
- Cato v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-22· cited 21×
- Sarah S. Wagner v. Charles A. WagnerD.C. Circuit· 1961-06-22· cited 18×
- Gimbel v. GimbelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-07-29· cited 16×
- Feldmann v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-10-01· cited 16×
- Pezas v. PezasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1964-05-12· cited 14×
- Cato v. CatoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-24· cited 12×
- Berrios v. PerchikMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-06-13· cited 11×
- Castro v. UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1964-04-30· cited 8×
- Samrov v. SamrovConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-03-25· cited 3×
- Stanley v. StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1970-12-11· cited 2×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1917-03-06· cited 139×
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Texas-Ohio Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-02-17· cited 72×
- Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-11-13· cited 64×
- Geary v. GearyNew York Court of Appeals· 1936-12-31· cited 61×
- Chapel-High Corp. v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1954-06-29· cited 54×
- Beardsley v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1957-12-26· cited 43×
- Hyde v. RichardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-01-21· cited 43×
- Hood v. HoodSupreme Court of Georgia· 1908-05-13· cited 34×
- Mendrochowicz v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-02-17· cited 31×
- Proctor v. ProctorIllinois Supreme Court· 1905-04-17· cited 24×
- Anderson v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1907-10-23· cited 15×
- Sanford v. PondSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1871-02-15· cited 13×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont· 1901-11-29· cited 13×
- Cady v. GaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1863-03-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.