Carter v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarriage and other subsequently and voluntarily acquired obligations do not mandate reduction of alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schuler v. Schuler
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-27· cited 90×
• Williams v. Williams
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-04-21· cited 36×
• Kramer v. Kramer
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-05-15· cited 27×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lambert v. Lambert
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-06-24· cited 83×
• Mitchell v. Mitchell
  Utah Supreme Court· 1974-11-07· cited 30×
• Gordon v. Gordon
  Washington Supreme Court· 1954-02-15· cited 28×
• Reed v. Reed
  California Court of Appeal· 1954-11-17· cited 14×
• Pierpont v. Hydro Manufacturing Company, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-09-26· cited 11×
• Hansen v. Hansen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10×
• Sorensen v. Sorensen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1968-02-29· cited 9×
• State, in Interest of Hales
  Utah Supreme Court· 1975-07-29· cited 8×
• Allen v. Allen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1970-08-17· cited 4×