Carter v. Carson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court had no authority to set a special condition which enjoined the defendant from engaging in employment connected with or dealing in the possession of obscene materials because the condition was not provided for by the rules
• condition of pretrial release prohibiting defendants from selling obscene material improper as not bearing any relationship to insuring their appearance at future court proceedings
• condition of pretrial release prohibiting defendants from selling obscene material improper as not bearing any relationship to insuring their appearance at future court proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hernandez v. Roth
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-29· cited 9×
• Glinton v. Wille
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-10· cited 5×
• Tinsley v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-08-25· cited 4×
• State v. Tavone
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1982-05-27· cited 2×
• Middleton v. Polk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-24· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Barber
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-06-12· cited 144×
• Ladoga Canning Corp. v. McKenzie
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-05-03· cited 3×