Carter v. Builders' Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court lacks the “authority to include incomplete transfers of possession within the meaning of ‘distribute’ as it relates to child pornography.”
• concluding that the court lacks the “authority to include incomplete transfers of possession within the meaning of ‘distribute’ as it relates to child pornography”
• holding that the guilty plea was “improvident because it [wa]s supported only by facts that the images and videos were made available” and there was no evidence of “a completed transfer of possession of the contraband”
• holding that the guilty plea was “improvident because it [wa]s supported only by facts that the images and videos were made available” and there was no evidence of “a completed transfer of possession of the contraband”
• declining “to include incomplete transfers of possession within the meaning of ‘distribute’ as it relates to child pornography”
• finding a. guilty plea to child pornography distribution improvident where there was no evidence any other person actually downloaded any files the accused made available through the peer-to-peer file sharing program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).