Carter v. B & B Construction, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when doctor testified that employee’s work injury was substantial factor in bringing about permanent total disability, employer’s rebuttal evidence was insufficient to overcome presumption of compensability
• noting that doctor completed a form stating that employee was permanently and totally disabled and diagnosing only work-related neck condition
• noting that the work-related injury must be a substantial factor in causing a disability
• interpreting AS 23.30.041(k) and holding “that the reemployment process begins when the employee begins his active pursuit of reemployment benefits”
• reciting director of Workers’ Compensation Division testimony in explaining statutory amendment’s purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).