Carter Oil Co. v. Mottley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with the conclusions from other circuit courts that “[a]n ALJ may not simply ignore medical opinions because they pre-date the onset of disability or post-date the last insured date, since that evidence can be relevant to a claim of disability.”
• ALJ erred in failing to consider pre-onset opinions regarding capacity to sustain employment because of recurrent hepatitis
• Though the plaintiff claimed disability starting in 2011, the ALJ erred in failing to address opinions by treating physicians given in 2009 and 2010, stating she would not be able to sustain employment because of recurrent hepatitis C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).