Skip to main content
· 4/27/1984

Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. v. Limited, Inc.

Citations

  • 587 F. Supp. 246
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the proposed merger is completed, [the target] will be a part of the very entity it claims will have a supercompetitive advantage, i.e., it suffers no antitrust harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.