Cartagena v. Access Staffing, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, following Lexmark, it is incorrect to clas- sify “so-called” statutory-standing defects as jurisdic- tional
• recognizing that “those who possess ‘exclusionary rights’ in a patent suffer an injury when their rights are infringed”
• holding that even though the plaintiff did not possess all substantial rights in the asserted patents, its allegations still satisfied the 28 1 Supp. 2d 551 (S.D.N.Y. 2002
• recognizing that patentees cannot award a “hunting license” to third parties
• recognizing that patentees cannot award a “hunting license” to third parties
• explaining that a requirement of consent prior to alienation “will always control how the patents are asserted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).