Carson v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Petitioner was entitled to confront and cross-examine the persons who provided the evidence which resulted in his loss of liberty. By not being afforded that opportunity, petitioner was denied the minimal rights of due process to which he was entitled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. MacK v. Purkett
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1992-02-28· cited 12×
• In the Interest of: T.D.S., Jr.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-10-26
• State of Missouri, ex rel. Michael Joe Butler, Relator, v. Honorable Joseph Rathert, Circuit Judge, Respondent.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2025-09-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Moore v. Stamps
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1974-03-19· cited 44×
• Reiter v. Camp
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1974-12-30· cited 20×
• Powell v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-14· cited 18×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-09· cited 12×
• State ex rel. Robinson v. Corum
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-07-29· cited 2×