Carson v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that abrogation of privilege applied only to communications dealing with child abuse or neglect, while the privilege provision continued in effect as to other communications
• although child abuse statute states it applies to activities of HRS, broad language of statute indicates intent to discourage child abuse, whether by criminal prosecution or by civil lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fischer v. Metcalf
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-18· cited 38×
• Stewart v. Mussoline
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-22· cited 12×
• Viveiros v. Cooper
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-27· cited 6×
• Hill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-06· cited 6×
• Jett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-25· cited 5×
• Saenz v. Alexander
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-31· cited 3×
• Doherty v. JOHN DOE NO. 22
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-23
• Jean-Baptiste v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kastigar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
• Fisher v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
• Minnesota v. Murphy
  Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
• Lefkowitz v. Turley
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 1,102×
• United States v. Monia
  Supreme Court· 1943-02-08· cited 413×
• West Volusia Hosp. Auth. v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-01-28· cited 18×
• Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Jackson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-29· cited 10×
• Eh v. State, Dept. of H & R Services
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-24· cited 7×