· 8/27/2003
Carson v. Dynegy, Inc.
Citations
- 344 F.3d 446
- 67 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1932
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17922
- 2003 WL 22017278
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering whether nonexclusive license was created despite defendant not having asked plaintiff to create a product
- finding conversion claim under Texas law was not preempted where complaint alleged physi- cal retention of tangible forms
- finding conversion claim under Texas law was not preempted where complaint alleged physical retention of tangible forms
- finding conversion claim under Texas law was not preempted where complaint alleged physi- cal retention of tangible forms
- explaining that Texas conversion law “concerns only physical prop- erty”
- “It is settled that a ‘nonexclusive license may be irrevocable if supported by consideration.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benavides, Jones, Kazen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.