Carson v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that husband and minor children of intoxicated decedent “are entitled to have the jury weigh all the direct and inferential evidence relating to their loss of ‘means of support’”
• holding that husband and minor children of intoxicated decedent \are entitled to have the jury weigh all the direct and inferential evidence relating to their loss of `means of support'\
• husband and minor children of intoxicated decedent had cause of action for loss of \means of support\ under dram shop act
• husband and minor children of intoxicated decedent had cause of action for loss of “means of support” under dram shop act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).