Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/4/2000
Carson v. Carson
Citations
- 13 P.3d 523
- 170 Or. App. 263
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1670
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is some question whether the South Dakota Supreme Court’s jurisdictional ruling in [NAH] is correct.”
- “There is some question whether the South Dakota Supreme Court’s jurisdictional ruling in [NAH] is correct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Armstrong, Kdstler, Kistler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Antoinette S.California Court of Appeal· 2002-12-31· cited 116×
- In re MorrisMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-05-04· cited 87×
- In Re Daniel M.California Court of Appeal· 2003-06-20· cited 55×
- State Ex Rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. AmadorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-22· cited 5×
- Orange County Social Services Agency v. R.S.California Court of Appeal· 2002-12-31· cited 1×
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Richard S.California Court of Appeal· 2003-06-20· cited 1×
- in Re J L Gordon MinorMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-05-04
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.