Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

Carson Harbor Village Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, Dba Carson Harbor Village Mobile Home Park v. City of Carson, a Municipal Corporation

Citations

  • 37 F.3d 468
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 13751
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7467
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Fjacial [takings] claims necessarily rest on the premise that an interest in property was taken from all mobile home property owners upon the statute’s enactment.”
  • \[F]acial [takings] claims necessarily rest on the premise that an interest in property was taken from all mobile home property owners upon the statute's enactment.\
  • a subsequent landowner “has no standing to assert facial claims based on the loss of the premium and the loss of the right to dispose of property”
  • “[F]acial [takings] claims necessarily rest on the premise that an interest in property was taken from all mobile home property owners upon the statute’s enact- ment.”
  • a subsequent landowner “has no standing to assert facial claims based on the loss of the pre- mium and the loss of the right to dispose of property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Beezer, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.