Skip to main content
· 6/1/2006

Carruthers v. Ludlow Taylor Elementary School

Citations

  • 432 F. Supp. 2d 75
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35134
  • 2006 WL 1517518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the plaintiffs untimely motion for reconsideration filed with the administrative hearing officer did not toll the time to file her action with the district court
  • “[T]he limitations period is ‘mandatory and jurisdictional: once the time prescribed by the rules is passed, [the court is] without the power to hear the case.’ ”
  • “[T]he limitations period is ‘mandatory and jurisdictional: once the time prescribed by the rules is passed, [the court is] without the power to hear the case.’”
  • “[T]he limitations period is ‘mandatory and jurisdictional: once the time 7 When the HOD was issued, Plaintiff had thirty days to appeal. See Douglass, 605 F. Supp. 2d at 163-64. 7 prescribed by the rules is passed, [the court is] without the power to hear the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.