Carrs Fork Coal Co. v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[t]his argument - that dancers can 'hustle' to increase their profits - has been almost universally rejected\
• finding dancer's investment in clothing, makeup and costumes minuscule when compared to defendant's investment in adult club
• finding dancer’s investment in clothing, makeup and costumes minuscule when compared to defendant’s investment in adult club
• “the classification of a worker as an employee or an independent contractor is a fact-intensive inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).