Carrozzo v. Carrozzo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a plaintiff claiming misrepresentation under the Insurance Code must point to an express misrepresentation or omission but did not require reliance as an independent element
• “Because ‘payment in full’ is an affirmative defense for which a defendant bears the burden of proof, Geico could not raise such a defense in a no-evidence motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).