Carroll's Lessee v. Andrew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing whether in light of the facts and circumstances confronting the officers, it was objectively reasonable to conclude that the arrest in question was supported by probable cause
• \[T]he recognition of a privilege should be judged on a case-by-case basis and weighed against the public interest.\
• \[T]he recognition of a privilege should be judged on a case-by-case basis and weighed against the public interest.\
• \[T]he recognition of a privilege should be judged on a case-by-case basis and weighed against the public interest.\
• \[T]he recognition of a privilege should be judged on a case-by-case basis and weighed against the public interest.\
• “Since they did not have probable cause to arrest Alford for violating the Privacy Act, defendants now claim on appeal that they had probable cause to arrest Alford for offenses other than tape recording and therefore, Alford’s rights were not violated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).