Skip to main content

Carroll v. State

Citations

  • 327 So. 2d 881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • improper voir dire questions by counsel did not rise to the level of a criminal contempt in the absence of a specific prior warning by the court in that trial to refrain from such questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson, Haverfield and Nathan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.