District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/24/1976
Carroll v. State
Citations
- 327 So. 2d 881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- improper voir dire questions by counsel did not rise to the level of a criminal contempt in the absence of a specific prior warning by the court in that trial to refrain from such questions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson, Haverfield and Nathan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Krueger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-08-02· cited 33×
- Ray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-07· cited 22×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-18· cited 14×
- Carnival Corp. v. BeverlyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-16· cited 12×
- Litus v. McGregorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-02· cited 10×
- Michaels v. LoftusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-02· cited 7×
- Tarrant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-06· cited 4×
- Segrest v. StateFlorida Circuit Courts· 1987-12-29
- Breslin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-04
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.