Skip to main content
· 2/7/2002

Carroll v. Paddock

Citations

  • 764 N.E.2d 1118
  • 199 Ill. 2d 16
  • 262 Ill. Dec. 1
  • 2002 Ill. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a nonprofit hospital may not be a “local public entity” entitled to utilize the Act and its one-year limitations period if the hospital was not found to have conducted “public business”
  • holding that a nonprofit hospital may not be a “local public entity” entitled to utilize the Act and its one-year limitations period if the hospital was not found to have conducted “public business”
  • holding that a nonprofit hospital may not be a \local public entity\ entitled to utilize the Act and its one-year limitations period if the hospital was not found to have conducted \public business\
  • holding that a nonprofit hospital may not be a \local public entity\ entitled to utilize the Act and its one-year limitations period if the hospital was not found to have conducted \public business\
  • finding that a not-for-profit hospital and a not-for-profit mental-health-care organization were not the same as public facilities operated by public employees under the control of the government
  • finding that a not-for-profit hospital and a not-for-profit mental-health-care organization were not the same as public facilities operated by public employees under the control of the government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kilbride, Carman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.