Carroll v. New Jersey Transit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mode-of-operation rule was irrelevant to claim of plaintiff injured after tripping on dog feces on subway steps
• holding a plaintiff's interrogatory response that flatly contradicted his own deposition testimony was insufficient to create a genuine dispute of material fact
• holding a plaintiff's interrogatory response that flatly contradicted his own deposition testimony was insufficient to create a genuine dispute of material fact
• explaining N.J.S.A. 59:4-2 \places the burden squarely on the A-4537-19 11 plaintiff to prove each of its elements\
• explaining N.J.S.A. 59:4-2 \places the burden squarely on the plaintiff to prove each of its elements\
• explaining N.J.S.A. 59:4-2 \places the burden squarely on the plaintiff to prove each of its elements\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).