Skip to main content
· 5/20/1999

Carroll v. Nagatori-Carroll

Citations

  • 978 P.2d 814
  • 90 Haw. 376
  • 1999 Haw. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting family court decisions only set aside on a manifest abuse of discretion
  • “Under the abuse of discretion standard of review, the appellate court is not authorized to disturb the family court's decision unless (1) the family court disregarded rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Levinson, Moon, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.