Skip to main content
· 6/28/2002

Carroll v. Interstate Brands Corp.

Citations

  • 121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 532
  • 99 Cal. App. 4th 1168
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 7466
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5958
  • 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases and finding that “[a|ppellate courts have consistently held that the trial court in the underlying action has no jurisdiction to determine the existence or validity of an attorney’s lien on the judgment.”
  • \An attorney's charging lien is created and takes effect at the time the fee agreement is executed.\
  • “An attorney’s charging lien is created and takes effect at the time the fee agreement is executed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.