Skip to main content
· 7/1/1858

Carroll v. Hinkley

Citations

  • 46 Me. 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that “the party to be bound in the second case must have been a party in the first case”
  • prior court judgment awarding attorney’s fee did not prevent consideration of ethical violation for the fee charged
  • listing the elements of issue preclusion under state law
  • “The rule contemplates that the court in which the doctrine is asserted will inquire into whether the judgment in the former action was in fact rendered under such conditions that the party against whom the doctrine is pleaded had a realistically full and fair opportunity to present his case.”
  • 30-day suspension and public reprimand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.