Skip to main content
· 3/22/2001

Carroll v. Fordham

Citations

  • 781 So. 2d 1156
  • 2001 WL 276986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remanding a final judgment for the trial court to make the appropriate, additional findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with the law of boundary by acquiescence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.