D. New Jersey· 3/2/2015
Carroll v. Delaware River Port Authority
Citations
- 89 F. Supp. 3d 628
- 202 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3445
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24455
- 2015 WL 865121
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “hold[ing] that claims of discrimination based on a disability arising from military service are not cognizable under USERRA,” citing cases
- rejecting the plaintiff’s state-created danger claim on the ground that the school defendants’ failure to implement an identification system despite knowledge of higher instances of trespassers at the school was a failure to act rather than an affirmative act
- “[A] USERRA plaintiff has the initial burden of demonstrating that his military service, as distinct from a disability resulting from service, was a substantial or motivating factor in the employer’s decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irenas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Carroll v. Delaware River Port Authority
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.