Carroll v. City of Carrollton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the parties do not dispute the purely recreational purpose of the property, then no need to review individual plaintiff’s use of premises
• “The RPA draws no distinction between whether the property is owned by a private party or governmental entity.”
• “Failure to observe a constitutional right constitutes reversible error unless it can be shown that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).