Carroll v. Cellco Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although plaintiffs need not prove reliance under the Consumer F raud Act, they must show an ascertainable loss as a result of d efendant’s 3 conduct and a ca usal relationship.”
• ironically denying certification because of the highly individual nature of the claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).