Carroll v. Carman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police officers should have been entitled to qualified immunity when they entered onto a ground-level deck on the back of a home to knock on a sliding-glass door, believing the door to be a “customary entryway”
• “[E]xisting precedent must have placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate.” (quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added)
• in order for a right to be clearly established, “existing precedent must have placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate”
• MCRA claims subject to same immunity standard as § 1983 claims
• assuming circuit precedent may clearly establish law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).